In the first quarter of 2025, global financial markets experienced notable shifts in regional equity performance. Contrary to investors’ original expectations of continued U.S. market dominance, EAFE equities were among the best performers while U.S. equities were among the weakest as investors rotated away from the U.S. U.S. trade policy was a key cause of concern for investors, resulting in the outflow of capital from U.S. equities, a flight towards safer assets and a hostile global trade environment that threatens global economic growth. Value stocks led over growth stocks and gold prices skyrocketed over the period, benefiting Canadian equity markets. Global bond prices appreciated as yields declined, particularly in the U.S. Canadian bonds performed well, supported by the Bank of Canada’s rate cuts over the quarter.
Developed market equities returned 6.7% (MSCI EAFE Index CAD), U.S. equities returned -4.4% (S&P 500 Index CAD), Canadian equities returned 1.5% (S&P/TSX Composite Index), global bonds returned 0.8% (Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index CAD-Hedged), Canadian bonds returned 2.0% (FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index), and high-yield bonds returned 0.6% (ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Bond Index CAD-Hedged).
IG Climate Action Portfolio – Global Neutral Balanced generated a negative return for the quarter. The Mackenzie Canadian Sustainable Bond Fund, the Mackenzie Sovereign Bond Fund and the Mackenzie Greenchip Global Environmental Equity Fund were the largest contributors to performance.
Although its performance was positive, the Mackenzie Canadian Sustainable Bond Fund underperformed its benchmark due to its lower effective duration. Yields in Canada decreased (prices higher), as inflation rates declined over the period. The Mackenzie Sovereign Bond Fund posted a positive return over the quarter but underperformed its benchmark, as a decrease in Canadian yields generally benefited the benchmark more. Strong selection and an overweight position in the utilities sector contributed most to the fund’s relative outperformance during the quarter for the Mackenzie Greenchip Global Environmental Equity Fund.
The Mackenzie Betterworld Global Equity Fund, the Putnam – IG Sustainable Leaders Pool and the Rockefeller – IG Climate Solutions Pool were the largest detractors from performance. The Mackenzie Betterworld Global Equity Fund underperformed its benchmark with stock selection in the industrials and information technology sectors detracting most from performance. The Putnam – IG Sustainable Leaders Pool underperformed its benchmark, primarily due to muted stock selection in the financials and information technology sectors. The Rockefeller – IG Climate Solutions Pool declined over the quarter, led by weakness in stock selection in the industrials, health care and consumer staples sectors.