In the first quarter of 2025, global financial markets experienced notable shifts in regional equity performance. Contrary to investors’ original expectations of continued U.S. market dominance, EAFE equities were among the best performers while U.S. equities were among the weakest as investors rotated away from the U.S. U.S. trade policy was a key cause of concern for investors, resulting in the outflow of capital from U.S. equities, a flight towards safer assets, and a hostile global trade environment that threatens global economic growth. Value stocks led over growth stocks and gold prices skyrocketed over the period, benefiting Canadian equity markets. Global bond prices appreciated as yields declined, particularly in the U.S. Canadian bonds performed well, supported by the Bank of Canada’s rate cuts over the quarter.
The IG Growth Portfolio – Global Equity Balanced generated a negative return this quarter. The portfolio’s overall equity allocation detracted from returns while the fixed income allocation contributed.
The Mack EAFE Equity Pool, the Mack Canadian Equity Pool and the BlackRock – IG International Equity Pool were the largest contributors. The Mack EAFE Equity Pool was a strong performer, benefiting from its allocation to European equities. Underweight allocations to Japan and security selection in France contributed to relative performance. A slight detractor to returns was the pool's overweight allocation to Australia. The Mack Canadian Equity Pool generated a positive return due to strong contributions from the materials sector, but modestly underperformed its benchmark due primarily to security selection in the same sector. Security selection in the energy sector was the largest contributor to performance. The BlackRock – IG International Equity Pool was another beneficiary of strong EAFE equity performance.
The Mackenzie IG U.S. Equity Pool and the Putnam – IG U.S. Growth Pool were the largest detractors. The Mackenzie IG U.S. Equity Pool was led lower by stocks in the information technology and consumer discretionary sectors. Security selection in the health care and industrials sectors was a drag on relative performance. The pool's underweight allocation to the information technology sector was a leading contributor to relative returns. The Putnam – IG U.S. Growth Pool was led lower by poor performance in growth-oriented U.S. equities. Security selection in the information technology sector dragged on relative performance while security selection in the communication services sector was a leading contributor to relative returns.